Comments on: Why the Internet Still Doesn’t Have a Business Model For Content http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/ Just observing... Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:59:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: cheap christian louboutin http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-5621 cheap christian louboutin Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:58:22 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-5621 Very cool blog, I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also.I’m happy to find numerous useful info here in the post, we need word out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. http://www.christianoutletstore.net Very cool blog, I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also.I’m happy to find numerous useful info here in the post, we need word out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing.
http://www.christianoutletstore.net

]]> By: What Media Companies Could Learn From Microsoft: Smart Bundling » Andreas Goeldi http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-411 What Media Companies Could Learn From Microsoft: Smart Bundling » Andreas Goeldi Tue, 19 May 2009 20:12:38 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-411 [...] factor is the control of distribution channels (I blogged about this earlier). This is difficult to replicate in the digital world, because digital content is so easy to [...] [...] factor is the control of distribution channels (I blogged about this earlier). This is difficult to replicate in the digital world, because digital content is so easy to [...]

]]> By: felix http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-363 felix Fri, 08 May 2009 00:21:12 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-363 Like Prof. Dr. Dueck of IBM is always saying: "An old technology has to die first before a new one can succeed." So true! Let's wait for the old media to die. Although this won't solve the problem that the new media will face difficulties in monetizing due to the (as you mentioned) lack of a distrubution barriers and therefore wide split of revenues. Like Prof. Dr. Dueck of IBM is always saying: “An old technology has to die first before a new one can succeed.” So true!

Let’s wait for the old media to die.

Although this won’t solve the problem that the new media will face difficulties in monetizing due to the (as you mentioned) lack of a distrubution barriers and therefore wide split of revenues.

]]> By: Atanas http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-357 Atanas Fri, 01 May 2009 09:16:19 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-357 I like your thesis! But I dont agree with it to 100%. 1) The brand is build on matching quality of the content with the target group (and marketing). Having a wildely known brand is existential for the internet -when we are talking mass media. 2) Content itself doesnt aggregate revenue. Its distribution to the man does. So, imo, the old media has to rethink its distribution channels and adapt its corporate structure to the new situation. The business model stays the same. It should evolve but not change. PS: Sorry for my bad english! I like your thesis! But I dont agree with it to 100%.
1) The brand is build on matching quality of the content with the target group (and marketing). Having a wildely known brand is existential for the internet -when we are talking mass media.
2) Content itself doesnt aggregate revenue. Its distribution to the man does. So, imo, the old media has to rethink its distribution channels and adapt its corporate structure to the new situation. The business model stays the same. It should evolve but not change.

PS: Sorry for my bad english!

]]> By: FLOG http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-355 FLOG Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:53:22 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-355 gute Theses, <strong>gratuliere</strong>! gute Theses, gratuliere!

]]> By: Björn http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-354 Björn Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:53:26 +0000 http://blog.agoeldi.com/2009/04/28/why-the-internet-still-doesnt-have-a-business-model-for-content/#comment-354 This definitely is an example of excellent digital content. Now control its distribution and be the king... ;) Thanks for reorganising my mind on this topic. And: "The main reason we put up with inferior content in old media is because it’s more complicated or expensive to get to the really good stuff. That’s not the case anymore on the web." I think this is quite good news. To summarise, one could say in the web we could have a better incentive system for producing great content because that content is easier to find. D'accord? This definitely is an example of excellent digital content. Now control its distribution and be the king… ;)
Thanks for reorganising my mind on this topic.

And: “The main reason we put up with inferior content in old media is because it’s more complicated or expensive to get to the really good stuff. That’s not the case anymore on the web.” I think this is quite good news. To summarise, one could say in the web we could have a better incentive system for producing great content because that content is easier to find. D’accord?

]]>